Reviving Europe's moribund securitisation market was always going to be difficult, partly due to the harsher capital treatment meted out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. But proposals being discussed in the European Parliament risk smothering it completely – if they ever see the light of day. By Justin Pugsley
Examining the banking regulations that make you mad
Is a piece of banking regulation making you incandescent with Reg Rage? Email your suggestions for the next Reg Rage to email@example.com
There is growing exasperation in the banking community regarding the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s desire to reduce variations in bank risk-weighted assets in the name of simplifying comparisons, writes Justin Pugsley.
Among banks and brokers there has been a lot of concern about the EU’s trade reporting obligations, but some recent concessions have made the burden a little easier, writes Justin Pugsley.
The Basel Committee has decided that banks should not be allowed to use internal models to measure capital requirements for operational risk.
The fundamental review of the trading book is due for completion by the end of 2015, but impact studies have thrown up some alarming results.
Most popular content
- Top 1000 World Bank 2016 results
- Ultimate beneficial ownership: where are we and what does the future look like?
- The 40% costs cut: why banks must face up to a tough future
- Will Japan’s economy recover in time for the Tokyo Olympics in 2020?
- The future of RBS with Ross McEwan, chief executive, Royal Bank of Scotland