European Commission proposals to ease bank capital requirements on asset-backed securities have not yet satisfied the Europeans, but have already unnerved the Americans.
Examining the banking regulations that make you mad
Is a piece of banking regulation making you incandescent with Reg Rage? Email your suggestions for the next Reg Rage to email@example.com
End-users fear the European Banking Authority’s attempt to control shadow banking via bank exposure limits could backfire.
Proposed rules to impose a capital charge on interest rate risk on the banking book could make managing core lending much more complicated.
US and EU regulators have promised to keep working toward mutual recognition of each other’s derivative clearing houses, but there is an ideological gap to bridge.
The advent of swap execution facilities has not brought about the open access to trading that buy-side participants expected.
The Basel Committee’s fundamental review of the trading book is an immensely complicated task, and tight deadlines have the banks in a panic.
Proposals for the mandatory buy-in of securities if trades fail to settle could drive market-makers out of the market.
The European Parliament’s rapporteur is meeting stiff opposition to his idea of excluding market-making activities from bank structural reform.
A sweeping overhaul to EU rules on bond market transparency could aggravate a liquidity shortage in secondary trading.
The Financial Stability Board’s proposal for bail-in debt appears ill-suited to continental European banking group structures.
Most popular content
- The Banker Top 1000 World Banks 2015 ranking WORLD Press: IMMEDIATE RELEASE
- The bond bubble risk of cheaper corporate borrowing
- Top 1000 World Banks – China leads the efficiency league
- Top 1000 World Banks – Asia strengthens grip on global banking share
- Top 1000 World Banks – Market risk declining globally