Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
AmericasFebruary 27 2013

Chile's central bank governor keeps calm on currency

The expansionary monetary policies of developed countries is making life difficult for those in the developing world. So says Chile's central bank governor, who is keen to resist a 'currency war' – for now – and also tells The Banker why central bank independence is of great importance.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
Chile's central bank governor keeps calm on currency

With a gross domestic product (GDP) expansion of 5.5% in 2012, according the central bank, and a labour market close to full employment, Chile’s economy has been enviable even by Latin American standards. But the country is not immune to external economic issues, and its currency is starting to feel the effects of quantitative easing in the developed world. Talks of ‘currency wars’ from a number of countries were echoed by Chilean finance minister Felipe Larrain at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos this year, where he said he would support the central bank’s actions to ease pressure on the peso.

In an interview with The Banker in Santiago, Chile's central bank governor Rodrigo Vergara says the institution is open to various options in this respect, but he underlines the importance of central banks retaining their independence – in both Chile and elsewhere.

Q: What’s the effect of international expansionary monetary policy on Chile?

A: A concern that I have, in the case of Chile, and the concern of many emerging market economies, is the effects that this ultra-expansionary monetary policy in the developed world is having. Close-to-zero interest rates and quantitative easing – every other week we hear of yet another country introducing a new quantitative easing policy – are putting pressure on the exchange rate and asset prices in many other countries. Many economies are taking measures [to fight] this.

Q: Will Chile declare ‘currency war’ too?

A: This is a concern, not only for Chile and other emerging markets, but also for some developed economies, such as Australia, Canada. We have a flexible exchange rate system, but when you have this differential in interest rates [between us and] developed economies and, in addition to that, you have more quantitative easing, you start getting capital inflows, which produce an appreciation of the currency and have an effect on financial markets, such as the creation of credit booms and asset price booms. We are not intervening in the exchange rate market, we have not introduced, as other countries have done, capital controls, but we don’t rule out any instrument.

Q: How important is the independence of central banks?

A: I’m a firm believer in central bank independence. From a long-term perspective, I definitely think that central banks should remain independent. It’s good for the economy. There is always coordination [with the government] and that too is a good thing, but it doesn’t mean that [the central bank is] dependent on the government. It means that it shares a view, that it tries to coordinate policies, but if it has to take a decision in a certain direction, it takes that decision [independently]. Otherwise, in the long term, you would [inevitably] end up with high inflation.

Q: What do you think of alternatives to inflation targeting, such as nominal GDP targeting?

A: I’m very sceptical about that. Targeting nominal GDP is much more complicated than targeting inflation. You have to be mindful that nominal GDP is the sum of two things: real GDP, which eliminates inflationary effects and brings current-price GDP to base-year prices, and the GDP deflator [a measure of the level of current prices]. Also, with nominal GDP, you don’t have information with the same frequency as you do with inflation, where you have data every month. You usually have nominal GDP data quarterly. It is also more complicated to explain to the public. A simpler target is a better target. 

Q: What is the main challenge of central banks at the moment?

A: One challenge, mostly in the developed world, is to have a monetary policy that helps to spur economic growth. But another important challenge is how to deal with financial stability. Financial stability has become a big topic after the crisis and it is basically a central bank issue. Many central banks have financial stability in the mandate. In Chile we have a narrow mandate that is related mostly to the stability of the payments system. With an inflation target mandate, or price stability mandate, you have specific targets that are very clear and well known to everybody. In the case of financial stability, the target is broader, it is more difficult to define.

And it is not only a matter for the central banks. In Chile, we’ve created the Financial Stability Council, which the ministry of finance, the central bank, the superintendence of banks, the superintendence of securities and the superintendence of pension funds all participate in. It has been in existence for the past year. I would say that the main challenge for the future is probably how to make a financial stability mandate work for central banks.

Was this article helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!

Silvia Pavoni is editor in chief of The Banker. Silvia also serves as an advisory board member for the Women of the Future Programme and for the European Risk Management Council, and is part of the London council of non-profit WILL, Women in Leadership in Latin America. In 2019, she was awarded an honorary fellowship by City University of London.
Read more articles from this author