Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
Analysis & opinionOctober 23 2013

Regulation should not be a political tool

The UK and the US are taking very different regulatory stances, the former reverting to its characteristic light-touch while the latter is taking a heavy-handed approach, but both regimes are driven by political considerations rather than market needs and are therefore at risk of damaging their respective banking systems.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

At the end of the day, regulation is an intensely political affair. The UK government’s decision to consider giving Chinese state-owned banks the privilege of operating as branches rather than full-blown subsidiaries is seen by some as creating an unlevel playing field in pursuit of an economic aim. The announcement was made by UK chancellor of the exchequer George Osborne during a trade mission to China.

Clearly, if London wants to be an international centre for the renminbi it needs the Chinese banks to have a stronger presence in the City. Previously, they have indicated that Luxembourg may be a more favourable European location due to a better regulatory climate.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial