Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
CommentJanuary 28 2013

State bail outs are still with us

While regulation says that bondholders should be the ones to lose out when banks fail, the reality is that such write-downs are rarely forced.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

The big talk in regulation is about forcing bondholders to take a hit when banks collapse. The concern has to be that for all the efforts of Dodd-Frank, the UK Banking Act and the EU Recovery and Resolution Directive, the outcome is unenforceable – in other words, when a major financial institution gets into trouble the fear of spreading panic will prevent governments from forcing a haircut on bondholders.

The thinking in the eurozone illustrates the point. Holders of Irish bank bonds were fully compensated so landing the government with a bail-out bill to the tune of almost 40% of gross domestic product (GDP). The prevailing view is that the needs of eurozone creditors ranked higher than those of Irish taxpayers.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial