Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
BrackenJuly 25 2016

The role of shadow banks in banking and capital markets union

The shadow banking sector got a bad press after the global financial crisis, but it can be a valuable source of innovation while helping to mitigate financial risk, writes Harald Benink of the European Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

Notwithstanding the important progress on the European Banking Union (EBU), which began in November 2014, important challenges remain for the EU banking system. Non-performing loans (NPLs) of European banks are estimated to be worth about €1000bn according to recent estimates by the International Monetary Fund, and there are serious doubts about the credibility of the bail-in mechanism for unsecured creditors within the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) if a large bank faces insolvency or a systemic banking crisis erupts. It may take another crisis to establish the credibility – or lack thereof – of the SRM.

Another challenge for Europe is setting up a framework for a capital markets union (CMU). Transforming European finance from a primarily bank-based financial system into a system under which more of the funding is channelled directly to firms and households through non-bank financial institutions and securities markets encourages a shadow banking system. Work towards a CMU seems even more complex and politically difficult than the building of the EBU, given the extremely diverse legislative and regulatory climate regarding non-bank finance in EU countries and the resistance of national authorities to release powers to European authorities.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial