Scandals over personal information leaks mean the day is coming where we will pay someone to store our data securely, rather than trust current internet giants to do it for free, says Chris Skinner.

I keep thinking about the future internet and the ideal of creating a network where no one controls anything. It may sound silly, but it is developing already.

In fact, in HBO’s excellent series Silicon Valley, the guys at start-up Pied Piper recently did a pivot to try to create exactly this. The gang are trying to create a new internet that cuts out intermediaries such as Facebook and Google by using a peer-to-peer network built on top of every smartphone on the planet, effectively rendering huge data centres full of servers unnecessary.

“If we could do it, we could build a completely decentralised version of our current internet, with no firewalls, no tolls, no government regulation, no spying. Information would be totally free in every sense of the word,” says Richard Hendricks, the leader of Pied Piper, on the show.

A utopian dream?

Regardless of what you think, this is going to happen anyway, as people like world wide web inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee work hard on creating a decentralised network.

On the better web he envisions, users control where their data is stored and how it is accessed. For example, social networks would still run in the cloud, but you could store your data locally. Alternatively, you could choose a different cloud server run by a company or community you trust. You might have different servers for different types of information – one for health and fitness data, say, which is completely separate from the one you use for financial records.

This gets interesting as it does start to play to the data vault idea I’ve been floating for a while. In a future decentralised internet, the cloud server you trust may well be the bank’s server. Why? Because the bank has a licence to guarantee your data is stored and never lost. That licence is currently for your money but, as data is money, it is now for your data.

What would I store there? Photos, memories, documents, cryptocurrencies, wire transfers, digital assets.

In a future decentralised internet, the cloud server you trust may well be the bank’s server

In fact, it is interesting when I think about digital assets and realise I have a lot of them today. A decade’s worth of memories on Facebook and Twitter; $1000s in cryptocurrency; e-mails documenting contracts and investments; a lengthy track record of buying rubbish on Amazon and eBay; and so on.

Sure, I have the physical manifestation of these investments and purchases, but the actual transaction of buying something, at a certain price on a certain day, is important to me too. How much did you spend on that Captain Scarlet collection in 2005? What is the value today of the comic you bought 10 years ago for $5? Is it worth selling your car, and how much has it devalued?

Right now, I have no safe store for this data. Equally, where I do use a safe store – Facebook and Gmail – there is no guarantee they will store it. Even if they do, there’s no safety around that data, which is why it gets abused by companies, namely in rigging search results, promoting fake news and selling your personal details to anyone who wants them. If the service is free, you are the product.

Safe place

This is why I keep coming back to the idea that people will pay for a safe data store in a decentralised internet. If I now have to manage my own data, rather than a centralised service doing it for me, then what does that mean? It means that I need a safe way to manage my data. Even the most aware of us are probably bad at doing this – how often do you back up your photos and do you do it once, twice or many times? – and this will become a differentiating factor in the future.

For example, someone asked me: "How will banks make money on storing memories?" I said they would charge for it like an insurance policy: What are your memories worth? $1m? OK, the charge for our data vault is $100 a year for that coverage; $1000 for $10m coverage; or $10 for $100,000 cover… You get the idea.

This concept of a decentralised network will create new business models and structures – and the storage of digital assets will be a huge new financial marketplace opportunity for those who get there first.

Chris Skinner is an independent financial commentator and chairman of the London-based Financial Services Club.

PLEASE ENTER YOUR DETAILS TO WATCH THIS VIDEO

All fields are mandatory

The Banker is a service from the Financial Times. The Financial Times Ltd takes your privacy seriously.

Choose how you want us to contact you.

Invites and Offers from The Banker

Receive exclusive personalised event invitations, carefully curated offers and promotions from The Banker



For more information about how we use your data, please refer to our privacy and cookie policies.

Terms and conditions

Join our community

The Banker on Twitter