Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

The changing definition of a deposit

Previously, clients would call their bank to warn of an unintended overdraft position; today they call if they want to leave more money than usual on their account. Koral Araskin, liquidity manager in Deutsche Bank’s institutional cash management division, explains how regulation has affected the liquidity management landscape and why there is no one-size-fits-all approach to deposit optimisation.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

Q: In January 2017, banks took another step closer to fully implementing the post-crisis regulations set out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, as part of the phase-in arrangements. In addition, the Basel III reforms triggered a new interpretation on operating cash. What are the main considerations for institutions going forward?

A: That is true: under Basel III there is a much stricter definition of the term ‘operating cash’. Under Basel I and II, operating cash could pretty much include all types of cash received from a depositor and, therefore, the more deposits a bank held, the better. However, now under Basel III, there is a need to understand the correlation of clients’ deposits to the clients’ product usage depth with the bank to determine whether a client deposit is ‘good’ or not.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial