Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

ESG ratings are still our best option

Often criticised, ESG ratings have an important role to play in the ESG ecosystem, but we need regulation that will improve measurement. By Florian Berg, Jason Jay, Julian Kölbel and Roberto Rigobon.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
ESG ratings are still our best optionImage: Getty Images

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings and ratings agencies have faced substantial criticism lately for a fair amount of mismeasurement and a lack of transparency in their procedures. Some are calling for a complete overhaul or abandonment of the ratings altogether.

In a new journal article – “The Signal in the Noise” – we argue that abandoning or standardising ESG ratings is not the answer. The ethical behaviour of firms remains essential to the health of economies, societies and the natural environment. And ESG ratings, though flawed, are currently still the best option to measure the ethical behaviour of firms. They can empower investors and other stakeholders to hold firms accountable.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial