To earn $1, diversified banks spend about 60 cents. A convoluted set of financial services processes, fragmented systems and legacy interfaces affect structural expense. Continual processing and system errors cause frequent rework and ineffective controls.

In the comparative chart between technology and operational efficiency, the vertical axis shows TowerGroup’s IT spending estimates for selected banks, and the horizontal axis reflects their cost-to-income ratio. The diagonal arrow points to an efficiency goal of reducing structural expense with an optimal level of IT investment. Some banks have improved through process simplicity, execution, standardisation and eliminating patchy functionality and redundant operations. Others have been mired in restructuring cost, penalties and write-offs.

However, enterprise technology solutions can improve cost structure. Corporate mergers have helped in consolidating technologies and getting rid of lesser solutions. Efficient banks have the upper hand in mergers, and only the fittest may survive.

Guillermo Kopp, vice-president of financial services strategies and IT investments at TowerGroup.

E-mail: gkopp@towergroup.com.

PLEASE ENTER YOUR DETAILS TO WATCH THIS VIDEO

All fields are mandatory

The Banker is a service from the Financial Times. The Financial Times Ltd takes your privacy seriously.

Choose how you want us to contact you.

Invites and Offers from The Banker

Receive exclusive personalised event invitations, carefully curated offers and promotions from The Banker



For more information about how we use your data, please refer to our privacy and cookie policies.

Terms and conditions

Join our community

The Banker on Twitter