Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
Western EuropeOctober 1 2018

Supervisors or enforcers: who steers AML in Europe?

Even after several revisions, the EU’s anti-money laundering directive does not definitively answer the question of whether a unified EU approach to AML is needed and politically achievable. Stefanie Linhardt reports.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

Money laundering and the response to it are firmly back on the European agenda. After cases of alleged money laundering involving lenders in Latvia, Estonia and Malta in 2018, questions have been raised over the effectiveness of Europe’s anti-money laundering (AML) measures and if EU authorities, including the European Central Bank (ECB), require greater supervision and enforcement powers.

Indeed it is still often the US, mainly the US Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), that points the finger and highlights AML shortcomings, even in Europe. Latvia’s second largest bank by assets on year-end 2016 data, ABLV Bank, was a case in point.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial