Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
Western EuropeMay 4 2011

Credit Suisse defied CoCo critics with $2bn issue

Contingent capital is still the subject of furious debate. Some have called it a dangerous instrument, while others say it may not do what regulators want. Some argue that it will be difficult to create a market big enough to absorb the needs of the banking sector if it becomes a compulsory part of the capital structure. But none of this stopped Credit Suisse's $2bn issue from being a storming success.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

Ever since the financial crisis, regulators have been debating how much capital banks should hold on their balance sheet and in what form. Last October, the Swiss announced their views on the topic. Systemically important Swiss banks, in other words Credit Suisse and UBS, would have to hold total capital equivalent to 19% of risk-weighted assets on their balance sheets, including 9% of contingent capital – bonds that convert into equity when certain trigger points are breached.

The ‘Swiss finish’, as it quickly became known, prompted a flurry of debate. Global and local bankers as well as investors grappled with how contingent convertible capital instruments (CoCos) would work and who would buy them.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial