Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
PolicyMarch 10 2009

Guarantees: a double-edged sword

As the search goes on for culprits and remedies in the global financial crisis, not enough attention has focused on the role played by governments in explicitly or implicitly guaranteeing the banking system.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

The huge bank bailouts under way across the industrial world make the point: governments cannot allow banks to fail for fear that the collapse of one will provoke a systemic crisis. By extension, perhaps government guarantees played a central role in creating the mess, so reforming them will be key to preventing a recurrence.

Consider the role played by guarantees in encouraging banks to operate with high levels of leverage prior to the crisis. The market believed that their liabilities – not just customer deposits but also their uninsured public debt – were guaranteed by government regulators. This kept the price of their borrowing artificially low: banks with leverage to assets ratios of 80% or 90% were able to borrow at just 20 basis points more than government bonds.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial