Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
RegulationsJanuary 1 2016

Structural reforms left behind by changes to banking markets

Structural reforms have consumed an immense amount of time and effort from regulators and industry participants in the past few years, but will they be made obsolete by more general changes to the global banking market? 
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

For many years, the US Volcker Rule was the poster-child of structural reform in the banking sector. Though it was never originally intended for inclusion in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, an endorsement from president Barack Obama and other senior figures saw it added as a late-stage amendment, creating furious debate over whether it was appropriate, or even feasible. 

In theory, prohibiting banks from engaging in ‘proprietary trading’ – that is, trades designed solely to turn a profit for the bank, rather than hedge risk or offer liquidity to clients – with depositors’ money sounds simple. As it turned out, the stricture dropped regulators and banks into a rule-making minefield. 

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial