Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
Asia-PacificDecember 1 2019

Asia-Pacific's uneven Basel III mix

The Basel III rules on capital are supposed to ensure stronger banking – but in Asia's less developed markets, meeting the requirements is creating a new set of challenges. Kimberley Long reports.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

In theory, Basel III compliance should have been completed by now. The deadline was set at March 31 2019, and banks were given a six-year lead time. Under the rules of Basel III, a bank's capital adequacy ratio should be at least 8%, with the common stock ratio at 4.5% and Tier 1 capital at 6% to demonstrate capital adequacy. For Asia’s developed countries, this has not proved to be too difficult an exercise, and has created a strong buffer. 

In strong economies, reaching the point of compliance has been positive. Heakyu Chang, senior director, financial institutions, at Fitch, says: “Basel III is making banks better prepared for unexpected losses. If all banks are better prepared for a stress time, the banking system would remain more solid. And hopefully, investors’ confidence would remain and banks would not face a funding problem.”

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial
Kimberley Long is the Asia editor at The Banker. She joined from Euromoney, where she spent four years as transaction services editor. She has a BA in English Language and Literature from the University of Liverpool, and an MA in Print Journalism from the University of Sheffield. Between degrees she spent a year teaching English in Japan as part of the JET Programme.
Read more articles from this author