Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon
ArchiveJanuary 5 2004

Striking out Fannie Mae

Geraldine Lambe reports on the storm that is raging over proposals to introduce US-style government-sponsored agencies in Europe to aid the integration of the mortgage-backed securities market. European financial markets are usually chastised for taking the interventionist rather than the market route. Europe’s bureaucracy-heavy approach is blamed for slower growth and lower production levels compared with the leaner, meaner US financial machine. But in the case of a proposal from the European Mortgage Finance Agency project group (EMFA) to create a pan-European institution, sponsored by the EU, red-tape wielding Eurocrats cannot be held responsible.
Share the article
twitter-iconcopy-link-iconprint-icon
share-icon

The EMFA says a EU-sponsored entity – like the US’s Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac – would help to create a continent-wide, liquid, mortgage-backed securities (MBS) market. This, its proponents say, would give homeowners cheap fixed rate loans, remove credit risk from banks’ balance sheets and provide standardised instruments for investors.

But the proposal has brought a storm of criticism that European government-sponsored entities (GSEs) would damage the development of existing covered bond and mortgage-backed securities markets. Critics have been almost universal in criticising a dirigiste American model that would choke a successfully developing freewheeling European system.

To continue reading, join our community and benefit from

  • In-depth coverage across key markets
  • Comments from financial leaders and policymakers worldwide
  • Regional/country bank rankings and awards
Activate your free trial